Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it

 This past Sunday was the Second Sunday in Epiphany. The Scripture readings for the day were Isaiah 62:1-5, 1 Corinthians 12:1-11, and John 2:1-11. The Pastor preached from John and the Life Groups (small groups) were to take a deeper look at the passage. Which is exactly what our Life Group did. Here are some humorous and hopefully helpful thoughts from Jesus turning water into wine.

3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.
The wine failed, that is they ran out, but I love the KJV here, wanted wine. I mean, it means they ran out, but the picture is great, They wanted wine and there was no more.

They have no wine. It’s funny how women, especially mothers, can speak like this and men know what they mean. She doesn’t ask anything, or suggest a course of action, yet everybody who heard her say this, including Jesus, knew exactly what she meant.

4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee?
This is a sad translation. Literally it is, What to me and to thee, woman?

This is obviously an idiomatic expression. It occurs a few times in the New Testament*  as well as in the Septuagint+ . I believe the idea here is, “What is that to us? We’re just guests.” Like how we would say, “Why you telling me?”

Well, she was telling him this because she wanted him to do something about it!

Ah, but what about Jesus calling his own mother woman? This sounds disrespectful to the max. I’m pretty sure that most of us, if we ever called our mother woman would expect some kind of immediate backlash! Even as adults, there is no way we would address our mothers this way! So, was Jesus being just plain rude?

The Greek word is γυναι and refers to a woman of any age, whether a virgin, or married, or a widow: as a form of address, may be used -- either in indignation, or in admiration, or in kindness and favor, or in respect, John 2:4; 19:26 (Thayer’s Lexicon). “However, the Greek γυναι, having no synonym in our language, has a more respectful sound than ‘woman’. (John Bengel’s New Testament Commentary)

So, not only was he not being rude, he was being respectful. And notice, Mary is not offended; neither were any of those present. In fact, look at her response:

5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.  
I can’t even express how cool this is. While we struggle with whether Jesus is being rude, she simply turns to the servants and instructs them, "Whatever he may say to you, do." This is faith. She had utter confidence in Jesus. She wasn’t begging. She made known the need and had complete confidence that he was sufficient. Wow! This is just like when she was told she would have a son, she responded “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word.” Mary was a woman of faith.

This is faith - utter confidence in Jesus / complete confidence that he is sufficient. If we don’t have faith as strong as Mary's, how do we grow in faith?

Read the Word. “Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God.” Time in the Word strengthens and grows your faith as you learn the ways of the Lord and see the promises of God. Begin your quiet time in the Word, let your prayers rise up from what you’ve been reading.

Read accounts of God working. Seeing how God worked in the lives of other saints and answered their prayers is very encouraging. This is also the benefit of testimonies.

Remember how God has met you in the past. There is a gospel song that speaks to this, Count Your Blessings. (I’ve included it at the end)

6 And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece.  
I love the KJV here . . . firkins! I don’t know how much a firkin is…there is a note in my Bible that says it is 9 gallons; modern translations say “twenty to thirty gallons.” I’m not making a big deal of this, I just like the word firkins !

BUT, here is something to think about – imagine how long it would take to fill these waterpots. They had no hose, so it was done by hand. And I don’t know how far they had to go to get the water. Often times, when a story is put down into words you lose any notion of time. When you read this account you get the idea Jesus said, Fill the waterpots, and just like that, it was done. Nope.

Here’s something else to think about: When did the water become wine?

In my early years as a Christian I was in churches that taught this was NOT wine, but grape juice. They said there wasn’t enough time for the grapes to ferment. He could instantaneously turn water to grape juice but needed time for it to ferment?  Was it real wine? Yep. And good wine at that.

Another commentator took exception to the notion that all six waterpots were turned to wine, and suggested only that one decanter was changed. He didn’t like the idea of Jesus making so much wine, thereby encouraging people to get drunk. Seems to me one decanter of wine would not be enough to rescue the host from the embarrassment of running out of wine. I don’t know that the Jews were big on getting wasted, but they drank wine, considering it the blessing of God: “A feast is for laughter, and wine maketh merry.”

11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him.
This miracle is about Jesus; it manifests his glory. Interestingly, it was done on the “down low”, that is no one even knew about it. As far as the guests knew, the governor of the feast simply produced more wine. That is, no one but Mary, the disciples, and the servants. He manifested forth his glory and his disciples believed on him. Amen.

People think of this as a “Baptist hymn” but it’s not.
Johnson Oatman, Jr was an old-time Methodist.
But I'm certain Mr. Oatman wouldn't mind if we sang it!


* Matt 8:29, Mark 1:24, 5:7, Luke 4:34, 8:28, John 2:4
+ Judges 11:12, 2 Samuel 16:10, 19:2, 2 Kings 3:13, 2 Chronicles 35:21

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

Abandoned


Driving home from Ohio, something I was thinking about reminded me of a hymn. And my next thought was a sad one.

Why would remembering an old hymn result in a sad thought? Abandoning the hymnal means we no longer sing the old songs. But this isn’t simply reminiscing about “the good old days.” Let me explain.

There are generic hymnbooks out there, then there are the song books that reflect and promote the distinctives of that particular group. Nazarenes, (old time) Methodists, Assemblies of God, their books represent their emphases. The books above are from the Christian & Missionary Alliance and the Salvation Army. I was in Alliance churches using those hymnals and I used the Salvation Army song book. They definitely reflect the distinctives of each.

And that’s what’s sad. When we start singing choruses and praise songs, the old hymns of the deeper life are no longer heard. I miss them.

Don’t misunderstand, this is not a criticism - I like the modern worship songs. I also have in my library a great collection of chorus books. When I was pastoring, I oversaw the transition from a traditional hymn service to a contemporary praise and worship service. So I’m not merely some old fogey lamenting, “I wish we sang the songs of my youth.” No, I’m not complaining, I’m simply making an observation. After all, you can sing about the deeper life and never preach it, and you can teach the deeper life without singing it. (Although, I’m pretty sure your songs will begin to reflect your preaching.) I’m just sharing thoughts I had while driving home along the interstate in the rain.


my collection of hymnbooks


Now, what is this “deeper life” that I mentioned? See the following

What Is The Deeper Life? A.W. Tozer

The Crisis Of The Deeper Life, by Rev. George P. Pardington, Ph.D.

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

You’re obsessed with walking


We went to Ohio last weekend. I usually walk from the hotel to my daughters house (2 miles). I must’ve mentioned that and the possibility of walking somewhere else because my grandson said, “You’re obsessed with walking.”

I tried to explain the benefits of walking, but he wasn’t persuaded. “You can get in the car and be there right away. It’s just a waste of time. And so boring.”

I admit: you can arrive at your destination faster if you drive; and not much happens when you walk. He’s not wrong. So, why walk when you can drive?

Walking is good for you. He wasn’t impressed. He will be when he gets older. Although I hope he gets it before then. I’ve been taking the stairs and parking far away for a long time.

Walking is relaxing.

Walking does take a lot of time. Can’t deny that. But it’s good to be freed from the rush of modern life.

Walking allows you plenty of time to think. Thinking is good.

Walking allows you to see the world in a way you can’t see it from the car. You notice things. All kinds of things. You don’t really see your town when you’re whizzing along in your car.

But I get it. And more people agree with him than with me. I drive to more places than I walk to, and I should walk more. Am I “obsessed with walking”? No. I do walk to places more often than a lot of people, and I often park far away so I have to walk, but I’m not fanatical about it. I did walk to Anne’s house while we were there, but I didn’t make anyone else walk with me!