Tuesday, March 31, 2020

The Lord's Prayer

This week I want to take a brief look at the Lord’s Prayer. My plan is three posts:

(1) After this manner pray ye – the prayer itself
(2) So much negativity – objections to praying this prayer
(3) Positivity restored – objections shot down

Yesterday we considered the prayer itself, After this manner therefore pray ye. I know there are those who rarely pray this prayer, perhaps never in the church they attend, so I encouraged all my readers to pray this every day this week. I also know there are those who object to the present day use of the Lord’s Prayer. And that’s what I want to consider today, the objections offered by those who say this is not a prayer for Christians today.

So much negativity

In presenting a list of objections from those who don’t pray this prayer let me quote the Apostle, I speak as a fool. I don’t pretend this list is exhaustive, these are just some of the objections I’ve encountered in my many years in ‘non-liturgical’ circles.  In no particular order:


Everything Jesus said/taught was to Jews under the Law and has nothing to do with us. This is therefore not a Christian prayer. The entire ministry of Jesus was under the Law, all his teaching was part of the Old Covenant, not applicable to us today. The Gospel as we know it was preached by Paul. Paul is the one we should follow. Paul does not mention the Lord’s Prayer. This is not for us.
This would be the view of what is known as dispensationalism. Or perhaps more accurately, early or extreme dispensationalism.

There is a milder form of dispensationalism which, while not as extreme, still casts a jaundiced eye on this as being Jewish and not Christian, law and not grace. The thought is, it is good as far as it goes, but the Apostles and thus the Church have moved on to a higher spiritual realm of prayer.

Before giving us this prayer, Jesus said, But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking. The repeated use of this prayer falls under the category of vain repetitions. Besides, everybody knows that churches who use this prayer say the same things every week, and most likely aren’t even aware of what they are saying or what it means.

Which brings us to liturgy and ritual. Bad, just bad. Repeating the Lord’s Prayer is part of empty, mind-numbing ritual which should be avoided.

This is a Catholic thing, right?

True prayer is extemporaneous, spontaneous, unplanned, unprepared. Spiritual prayer is from the heart, depending on the Holy Spirit for the words and direction. Therefore, using the Lord’s Prayer, or any other written or prepared prayer, is not spiritual, is not praying in the Spirit.

Jesus gave this as a model for prayer, an outline of proper things to be prayed for. This was never intended as a prayer to be prayed.


Whew! That’s enough negativity for one day! Once again I encourage you to pray the Lord’s Prayer every day this week.


Wednesday – Positivity Restored: objections shot down!

Monday, March 30, 2020

The Lord's Prayer

This week I want to take a brief look at the Lord’s Prayer. My plan is three posts:
(1) After this manner pray ye – the prayer itself
(2) So much negativity – objections to praying this prayer
(3) Positivity restored – objections shot down

After this manner therefore pray ye

The Lord’s Prayer is found twice in the New Testament. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) Jesus teaches about righteousness, specifically almsgiving, prayer, and fasting (chapter 6). Concerning prayer he says, After this manner therefore pray ye. In Luke 11, when he had ceased praying the disciples said, Lord teach us to pray; he said, When ye pray, say.

They are substantially the same, but we are most familiar with Matthew 6

Our Father who art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil:
For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.

The prayer is rather straight forward, so I just have a few observations.

Our Father, who art in heaven – Clearly, Jesus intended this to be offered in a group setting, as all the pronouns are plural. BUT there is a wonderful truth in the plural pronouns – we are always part of something bigger than us. This is community. When we are the only believer in our family, in our city, in our people group, we are not in this alone, there is always we. This is part of the communion of the saints. I must have faith for myself, but as soon as I believe I am part of the family! It is not just me and Jesus, it is us; it is we; and my prayers should reflect this blessedness: Our Father.

The prayer consists of seven petitions: hallowed, come, be done, give us, forgive us, lead us not, deliver us.

Hallowed be they name – nearly every single time I hear someone teach on this prayer they say, 'This means to praise the Lord.' There are plenty of good words in the Bible for praise - hallowed is not one of them! Hallowed is an old English word. It is the verb form of holy. It means make holy. Hallowed is a translation of the Greek word agiazo, which everywhere else is translated sanctify. So this petition is, May your name be regarded as holy.

Thy kingdom come – we are praying for the return of Jesus and his kingdom on the earth. But we know that the kingdom has already begun, it is righteousness peace and joy in the Holy Spirit; it is power and not mere words.

Thy will be done – thy kingdom come, thy will be done. Notice, prayer begins with God, not me.

Give us this day our daily bread – God cares about our needs and Jesus teaches us not only dependence on our Father, but that it is his delight to meet our needs.

Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors – Jesus is teaching us to keep short accounts by confessing our sins and asking forgiveness. But notice, we are asking God to be as merciful to us as we are to others. You doubt this? Consider v 14-15. The only part of the prayer Jesus offers commentary on is forgiveness. Unforgiveness is a dam that hinders the blessings of God; this grows into bitterness, which is poison to my soul. Forgiveness is the dam-buster!

How is it that some churches say forgive us our trespasses? especially since the Greek word means, that which is owed, a debt. Reformed churches tend to use debts, Roman Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists tend to say trespasses. John Wycliffe, in the first English translation of the Bible (1395), had debts. William Tyndale (1526) used trespasses. In 1549 the first Book of Common Prayer in English had trespasses. This became the "official" version used in the Anglican community. Ironically, the King James Version (1611), the version specifically authorized for the Church of England, accurately translated it as forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. Bottom line, I don’t know why or how trespasses slipped in, perhaps because v 14 & 15 have trespasses. I always say, forgive us our debts.

Lead us not into temptation – “For the completeness of so brief a prayer He added — in order that we should supplicate not touching the remitting merely, but touching the entire averting, of acts of guilt — Lead us not into temptation: that is, suffer us not to be led into it, by him (of course) who tempts; but far be the thought that the Lord should seem to tempt, as if He either were ignorant of the faith of any, or else were eager to overthrow it. Infirmity and malice are characteristics of the devil.” (Tertullian, On Prayer)

But deliver us from evil – Do not allow us to be led into temptation but deliver us.

For thine is the kingdom – there are many who remove this from the prayer, declaring that it was not part of the original. Yet The Didache (100) has it. The Liturgy of St James, the oldest liturgy, which came from the church in Jerusalem, has it. The Liturgy of St Mark (tradition says he brought the gospel to Egypt), which is the liturgy of the Coptic Church, has it (of course, it also has trespasses!). I vote to keep it.

Amen. I encourage you to pray this prayer every day this week when you say your prayers.


Tuesday – So much negativity
Wednesday – Positivity restored

Wednesday, March 25, 2020

The Rule of Faith and the Scriptures

This is the final installment of this series on Apostolic Tradition. My main point concerning Apostolic Tradition is that the Apostles wrote some things down and delivered other things orally. The Bible would be the written down things, the inspired, authoritative Word of God. Apostolic Tradition would be the orally handed down things. The Apostles preached what Christ revealed to them “by declaring the gospel both vivâ voce, as the phrase is, and subsequently by their epistles.”* And what was it the Apostles declared and deposited in the Church vivâ voce or orally? The Rule of Faith, which I have traced from the early Rule of Faith to the Apostles’ Creed to the Nicene Creed.

“Now, with regard to this rule of faith it is, you must know, that which prescribes the belief that there is one only God, and that He is none other than the Creator of the world, who produced all things out of nothing through His own Word, first of all sent forth; that this Word is called His Son, and, under the name of God, was seen in diverse manners by the patriarchs, heard at all times in the prophets, at last brought down by the Spirit and Power of the Father into the Virgin Mary, was made flesh in her womb, and, being born of her, went forth as Jesus Christ; thenceforth He preached the new law and the new promise of the kingdom of heaven, worked miracles; having been crucified, He rose again the third day; (then) having ascended into the heavens, He sat at the right hand of the Father; sent instead of Himself the Power of the Holy Spirit to lead such as believe; will come with glory to take the saints to the enjoyment of everlasting life and of the heavenly promises, and to condemn the wicked to everlasting fire, after the resurrection of both these classes shall have happened, together with the restoration of their flesh. This rule, as it will be proved, was taught by Christ.”*

What is the relationship between vivâ voce and epistles? That is between the Rule of Faith and the Scriptures? I believe the Rule of Faith is the template for understanding and interpreting the Scriptures.

Oh right away I hear outcries and objections: “The Bible is our rule for faith because it is the Word of God!” I agree, the Bible is the Word of God. But think for minute, when we have new converts and give them a Bible, what do we say? “This is the Word of God.” It is the Rule of Faith which teaches us this, I believe in the Holy Spirit…who spoke by the prophets. You can learn this by reading the Bible, but we begin with the Bible as the Word of God because of the Rule of Faith.

We know that people come away from their Bible study with all sorts of different interpretations. This has been true since the days of Origen (AD 184-253). But while there will always probably be some differences, the Rule of Faith keeps us on track. (By the way, this was what Origen said!) What do I mean?

What if I interpret the Scriptures to teach that the Son was the first and highest of God’s creation? The Rule of Faith sounds the alarm – NO!

What if I interpret the Scriptures to teach that both the resurrection of Jesus and of saints in the future is spiritual and not bodily? The Rule of Faith sounds the alarm – NO!

What if my study of the Scriptures results in me saying the Holy Spirit is merely a power and not a person? The Rule of Faith sounds the alarm – NO!

What if I preach, There is no future judgment; all go to heaven, there is no hell for unbelievers. The Rule of Faith sounds the alarm – NO!

The Rule of Faith is our template, our fence, our guardian against error. The Bible DOES NOT say or mean whatever you want it to say or mean. If your interpretation is contrary to the Rule of Faith, you are wrong. They work together: the Rule of Faith tells us the Bible is the Word of God; we read the Word of God to nourish our faith; the Rule of Faith keeps us from getting off course when reading the Word of God. Amen!

“One Lord God does she [the Church] acknowledge, the Creator of the universe, and Christ Jesus born of the Virgin Mary, the Son of God the Creator; and the Resurrection of the flesh; the law and the prophets she unites in one volume with the writings of evangelists and apostles, from which she drinks in her faith. This she seals with the water of baptism, arrays with the Holy Spirit, feeds with the Eucharist, cheers with martyrdom, and against such a discipline she admits no gainsayer.”*



Your faith,’ He says, has saved you; not, observe, your skill in the Scriptures. 
Now, faith has been deposited in the rule; it has a law, and salvation.”*





*All quotes are from Tertullian, The Prescription Against Heretics

Tuesday, March 24, 2020

Why do so many churches not use the Nicene Creed?

The title should probably be, Why do so many Evangelical Churches not use the Nicene Creed? or the Apostles’ Creed? There may be a few other reasons, but I will highlight three.

#1 Creeds are man-made 

Baptists generally do not accept or embrace creeds. “ 'I’m a Baptist, and Baptists don’t believe in creeds.' [This is] a widespread sentiment in our context of Baptist life. One reason many Baptists see the creeds as un-Baptist is the oft-repeated slogan ‘No creed but the Bible!’ ”

(I have most often heard that slogan stated as, “No creed but Christ, no book but the Bible” and it seems to have originated in the work of Alexander Campbell (1788-1866). He was a Restorationist and eschewed creeds as do the churches tracing their origin to him: Churches of Christ & Disciples of Christ.)

"Southern Baptists do not subscribe to a creed and firmly believe in the Priesthood of the Believer," says Dr. David George, director of missions for the Chugach Baptist Association. "This means that we do not rely on any hierarchy to decree how we are to interpret scripture, but it is left up to the individual, his church, and the Holy Spirit."

(The Baptist Faith and Message has 18 articles)

Another group expressly opposed to creeds are Pentecostals.

“The founders of the Assemblies of God (more specifically, the early Pentecostals) desired to cut out any creed as being ‘man-made’. After but a few years, however, they formulated what they considered to be a Biblical statement of beliefs (though the language of a ‘creed’ was excluded, because there was still a rejection of things creedal as being ‘human’).”

(The AG Statement of Fundamental Truths has 16 points)

I was a pastor in the C&MA for 25 years. We didn’t use the Creeds. In fact, the early attitude was, “The Alliance has neither formal creed nor official confession of faith, so called; it has not felt the need of one” (although now there is a statement of faith). During my years in the Alliance we used three hymnbooks: the blue 1936, the red/gray 1962, 1972 purple. The red book had the creeds on the first page, the purple had the creeds between responsive readings and hymn index in the back.

I am persuaded that such attitudes are the result of not understanding Apostolic Tradition - the Rule of Faith was a deposit to be kept, guarded, and passed on rather than a development.

#2 It's Catholic

I believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church

‘We can’t use this because it is Catholic and we are definitely not Catholic.’

But is it true the creed promotes Roman Catholicism? No!

Just a little history. AD 1064 witnessed the Great Schism between the Orthodox Church of the East and the Roman Catholic Church of the West. 450 years before Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses on the Wittenberg church door on October 31, 1517 and the Protestant Reformation officially began, the Orthodox broke ranks with the Roman Catholic Church. The last thing the Orthodox want to be or promote is the Roman Catholic Church, yet they still confess, I believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.

Both the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church agree: “The word "catholic" is derived from the Greek adjective καθολικός (katholikos), meaning "general", "universal". Applied to the church, the adjective "catholic" means that in the church the wholeness of the Christian faith, full and complete, all-embracing, and with nothing lacking, is proclaimed to all people without excluding any part of the faith or any class or group of people. The adjective can be applied not only to the church as spread throughout the world but also to each local manifestation of the church, in each of which nothing essential is lacking for it to be the genuine Church of Christ.”

Amen! Is this not a grand truth worthy of explanation and confession?

#3 Baptism for the forgiveness of sins

I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins (I still have a tendency to say with the older version, remission of sins)

Folks say, “See, we can’t use it because we don’t believe in baptism for the remission of sins.”

Apparently these same folks have forgotten that baptism for the remission of sins is actually a biblical phrase:

Acts 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

If you use the NIV, NASB, ESV you will find forgiveness of sins; either way it is clearly a biblical phrase.

I can see someone jumping up, “What are you saying?!?” Just that it’s a biblical phrase. If you have a problem with the expression you have a problem with the Bible, not the creed.

Do you know the New Testament also says of baptism:

Acts 22:16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.

Titus 3:4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

1 Peter 3:21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:

Again, What am I saying?? Actually, I am not making any commentary on the meaning of baptism - you will have to decide what these passages mean. But if your view or doctrine of baptism does not allow you to use these expressions when you speak of it, may I suggest you need to rethink your doctrine of baptism, because it clearly is not biblical.


I believe the Nicene Creed reflects the deposit of The Faith handed down to the Church by the Apostles. Therefore, what we need is not the formulation of new statements of faith, but solid and sound teaching of The Faith as we find it in the Rule of Faith.


Wednesday - The Rule of Faith and the Bible

Monday, March 23, 2020

The Nicene Creed


This the seventh installment in my series on Apostolic Tradition. If you wish to review them
Apostolic Tradition 
Rule of Faith (Irenaeus)
Rule of Faith (Origen)
The Apostles' Creed
Faith of St Patrick
The Rule of Faith and the Apostles' Creed

As I said in my first post, Apostolic Tradition is the belief that the Apostles wrote some things down and delivered other things orally. The Bible would be the written down things, the inspired, authoritative Word of God. Apostolic Tradition would be the orally handed down things. And what was it they handed down orally? The Faith.

Today we come to the Nicene Creed. (Official Greek Orthodox English translation)

I believe in one God, Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all ages; Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten, not created, of one essence with the Father through Whom all things were made. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary and became man. He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried; And He rose on the third day, according to the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father; And He will come again with glory to judge the living and dead. His kingdom shall have no end.

And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Creator of life, Who proceeds from the Father, Who together with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified, Who spoke through the prophets.

In one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church.

I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.

I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the age to come.

Amen.


A few observations:

(1)  In Greek it begins, “We believe…”

(2) And in the Holy Spirit…who proceeds from the Father You will notice the filioque is missing. What is the filioque? The phrase and the Son. This was not part of the original creed and was added in the 6th century by the Catholic Church. The Orthodox consider this to be an unauthorized addition and was one of the main reasons for the Great Schism in 1066

(3) And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Creator of life. Personally, I believe καὶ εἰς τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ Ἅγιον, τὸ Κύριον καὶ Ζωοποιόν is better translated, and in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and giver of life.

(4) It is known as the Nicene Creed, but its official name is the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed because what we have today was formed by two Ecumenical Councils, the First Council of Nicaea in 325 and in 381 it was amended at the First Council of Constantinople.

How does this confession of faith relate to the Apostolic Tradition? First of all, you can see by the form and content that this is essentially the Rule of Faith. But, it is clear that this is an expanded form of the early Rule of Faith. Is this still part of the Apostolic tradition?

There was a tremendous controversy in the Church in the late 3rd century known as Arianism which nearly destroyed the Church. Arianism taught the Son was the first and highest of God’s creation and the Council of Nicaea was convened to settle this question. They were not creating a new creedal statement but were clarifying what had always been believed. In other words they were saying, "This is what the Church has always meant when she said, We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God." This is the Apostolic Faith made abundantly clear. Amen!


Tuesday – Why do so many churches not use the Nicene Creed?
Wednesday – The Bible and the Rule of Faith

Wednesday, March 18, 2020

The Rule of Faith and the Apostles’ Creed

Monday I presented the Apostles' Creed in my series on Apostolic Tradition. Yesterday I looked at The Faith of St Patrick, after all it was St Patrick's Day! Today I want to very briefly compare the Rule of Faith and the Apostles' Creed.

The Rule of Faith in Irenaeus (130-202) 
"The Church, though dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father to gather all things in one, and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Saviour, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess to Him, and that He should execute just judgment towards all; that He may send spiritual wickednesses, and the angels who transgressed and became apostates, together with the ungodly, and unrighteous, and wicked, and profane among men, into everlasting fire; but may, in the exercise of His grace, confer immortality on the righteous, and holy, and those who have kept His commandments, and have persevered in His love, some from the beginning, and others from their repentance, and may surround them with everlasting glory."

The Rule of Faith in Tertullian (155-220) 
I skipped over Tertullian when presenting the Rule of Faith, I had what I thought then was a good reason, which I can't remember now! Anyway, he presents the Rule of Faith two or three times in his works. This is from Prescription Against Heretics. Another book I recommend. (If you haven't gotten the hint, you should just read the Ante-Nicene Fathers!)

"Now, with regard to this rule of faith— that we may from this point acknowledge what it is which we defend — it is, you must know, that which prescribes the belief that there is one only God, and that He is none other than the Creator of the world, who produced all things out of nothing through His own Word, first of all sent forth; that this Word is called His Son, and, under the name of God, was seen in diverse manners by the patriarchs, heard at all times in the prophets, at last brought down by the Spirit and Power of the Father into the Virgin Mary, was made flesh in her womb, and, being born of her, went forth as Jesus Christ; thenceforth He preached the new law and the new promise of the kingdom of heaven, worked miracles; having been crucified, He rose again the third day; (then) having ascended into the heavens, He sat at the right hand of the Father; sent instead of Himself the Power of the Holy Spirit to lead such as believe; will come with glory to take the saints to the enjoyment of everlasting life and of the heavenly promises, and to condemn the wicked to everlasting fire, after the resurrection of both these classes shall have happened, together with the restoration of their flesh. This rule, as it will be proved, was taught by Christ."

The Rule of Faith Origen (184-253)  
"Now it ought to be known that the holy apostles, in preaching the faith of Christ, delivered themselves with the utmost clearness on certain points which they believed to be necessary to every one…
First, That there is one God, who created and arranged all things, and who, when nothing existed, called all things into being; and that this God in the last days, as He had announced beforehand by His prophets, sent our Lord Jesus Christ to call in the first place Israel to Himself, and in the second place the Gentiles.
Secondly, That Jesus Christ Himself, who came (into the world), was born of the Father before all creatures; that, after He had been the servant of the Father in the creation of all things— For by Him were all things made — He in the last times, divesting Himself (of His glory), became a man, and was incarnate although God, and while made a man remained the God which He was; that He assumed a body like to our own, differing in this respect only, that it was born of a virgin and of the Holy Spirit: that this Jesus Christ was truly born, and did truly suffer, and did not endure this death common (to man) in appearance only, but did truly die; that He did truly rise from the dead; and that after His resurrection He conversed with His disciples, and was taken up (into heaven).
Then, Thirdly, the apostles related that the Holy Spirit was associated in honour and dignity with the Father and the Son…
After these points, also, the apostolic teaching is that the soul shall, after its departure from the world, be rewarded according to its deserts, being destined to obtain either an inheritance of eternal life and blessedness… or to be delivered up to eternal fire and punishments: and also, that there is to be a time of resurrection from the dead. This also is clearly defined in the teaching of the Church, that every rational soul is possessed of free-will and volition.
Regarding the devil and his angels the teaching of the Church has laid down that these beings exist indeed...
This also is a part of the Church's teaching, that the world was made and took its beginning at a certain time, and is to be destroyed on account of its wickedness.
Then, finally, that the Scriptures were written by the Spirit of God.
This also is a part of the teaching of the Church, that there are certain angels of God which are His servants in accomplishing the salvation of men."

Apostles’ Creed
I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth.
And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord;
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate, crucified, dead, and buried; [he descended into hell] ;
the third day he rose again from the dead;
he ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty;
from thence he shall come to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit;
holy catholic Church;
communion of saints;
forgiveness of sins;
resurrection of the flesh;
life everlasting. AMEN


Now just a couple of observations:

(1) It is immediately apparent that they all follow the same basic trinitarian outline. This is the same faith and from the same source, which they themselves trace back to our Lord Jesus Christ through the Apostles. This is the Apostolic Tradition, that which the Apostles deposited in the Church and which was faithfully preserved and passed down by the presbyters and bishops.

(2) It is also obvious that the Apostles' Creed is a concise version of the Rule. I believe that is because this was originally the baptismal confession of faith. Having said that, just think our rich our preaching would be if we were teaching these things!

Tuesday, March 17, 2020

The Faith of St Patrick

Today is St Patrick's Day, the day we commemorate the apostle to Ireland. I have been doing a series on Apostolic Tradition in which I have looked at the ancient Rule of Faith. Yesterday we considered the Apostles' Creed, and I thought in honor of St Patrick I would offer his confession of faith. This is from his Confessio or Confession:


"And there the Lord opened my mind to an awareness of my unbelief, in order that, even so late, I might remember my transgressions and turn with all my heart to the Lord my God, who had regard for my insignificance and pitied my youth and ignorance. And he watched over me before I knew him, and before I learned sense or even distinguished between good and evil, and he protected me, and consoled me as a father would his son.

Therefore, indeed, I cannot keep silent, nor would it be proper, so many favours and graces has the Lord deigned to bestow on me in the land of my captivity. For after chastisement from God, and recognizing him, our way to repay him is to exalt him and confess his wonders before every nation under heaven:

For there is no other God, nor ever was before, nor shall be hereafter, but God the Father, unbegotten and without beginning, in whom all things began, whose are all things, as we have been taught; and his son Jesus Christ, who manifestly always existed with the Father, before the beginning of time in the spirit with the Father, indescribably begotten before all things, and all things visible and invisible were made by him. He was made man, conquered death and was received into Heaven, to the Father who gave him all power over every name in Heaven and on Earth and in Hell, so that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord and God, in whom we believe. And we look to his imminent coming again, the judge of the living and the dead, who will render to each according to his deeds. And he poured out his Holy Spirit on us in abundance, the gift and pledge of immortality, which makes the believers and the obedient into sons of God and co-heirs of Christ who is revealed, and we worship one God in the Trinity of holy name."

Patrick definitely held and preached the Apostolic faith!




Monday, March 16, 2020

The Apostles’ Creed

This is the fourth in my series on Apostolic Tradition. The first was Apostolic Traditionthe belief that the Apostles’ wrote some things down and delivered other things orally. The Bible would be the written down things, the inspired, authoritative Word of God. Apostolic Tradition would be the orally handed down things. What was it they handed down? The Faith, as I explain in The Rule of Faith from Irenaeus and from Origen.

Today I want to present


First, the creed itself

I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth.
And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord;
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate, crucified, dead, and buried; [he descended into hell;]
the third day he rose again from the dead;
he ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty;
from thence he shall come to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit;
holy catholic Church;
communion of saints;
forgiveness of sins;
resurrection of the flesh;
life everlasting. AMEN

I need to point out two things.

First, Since sme versions of the creed include the phrase, he descended into hell between crucified, dead, and buried and the third day he rose again, and some do not I have put it in brackets.

Second, The traditional English version says resurrection of the body while both the Latin and the Greek have resurrection of the flesh. I really like this strong emphasis!

This is traditionally accepted as the faith handed down by the Apostles’. (Don’t worry, I will address “holy, catholic Church!)


The Apostles’ Creed and the old Roman Symbol

The Apostles’ Creed has descended to us from what is known as the old Roman Rule of Faith. Here is the creed of the early church in Rome:

I believe in God the Father Almighty;
and in Christ Jesus His only Son, our Lord,
Who was born of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary,
Who under Pontius Pilate was crucified and buried,
and on the third day rose again from the dead,
ascended into heaven,
and sits at the right hand of the Father,
whence He will come to judge the living and the dead;
and in the Holy Spirit,
holy Church,
remission of sins,
resurrection of the flesh
life everlasting.

As you can see, they are very similar.

Hippolytus of Rome (170-235), in his book on Apostolic Tradition, reveals the baptismal creed used in Rome:

"When the person being baptized goes down into the water, he who baptizes him, putting his hand on him, shall say: "Do you believe in God, the Father Almighty?" And the person being baptized shall say: "I believe." Then holding his hand on his head, he shall baptize him once. And then he shall say: "Do you believe in Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who was born of the Virgin Mary, and was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and was dead and buried, and rose again the third day, alive from the dead, and ascended into heaven, and sat at the right hand of the Father, and will come to judge the living and the dead?" And when he says: "I believe," he is baptized again. And again he shall say: "Do you believe in the Holy Spirit, in the holy church, and the resurrection of the body?" The person being baptized shall say: "I believe," and then he is baptized a third time."

Here you can see the essence of the Apostles’ Creed, which suggests to me the Apostles’ Creed was a baptismal confession of faith.

Rufinus (340-410) wrote a commentary on the Creed of Aquileia, which he believed was composed by and handed down from the Apostles’ (and used in Rome), therefore the book is titled, Commentary on the Apostles’ Creed. You can read it here. I recommend it! Here is his version:

I believe in God the Father Almighty, invisible and impassible.
And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord;
Who was born from the Holy Spirit, of the Virgin Mary;
Was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and buried;
He descended to hell; on the third day he rose again from the dead.
He ascended to the heavens; he sitteth at the right hand of the Father;
Thence he is to come to judge the quick and the dead.
And in the Holy Spirit;
The Holy Church.
The remission of sins.
The resurrection of this flesh.

Again, essentially the Apostles' Creed.

Augustine (354-430), preached A Sermon to Catechumens, which you can read here, in which he expounds the creed, which is once again essentially the Apostles’ Creed.

I share all this simply to point out that the Apostles' Creed came down to us through Rome. As the church in Rome grew in power and stature, it is natural that her confession would rise in prominence.

The Apostles’ Creed and the Greek Orthodox Church (Eastern Orthodox)
“The Apostles’ Creed is widely used by many Western churches” (Roman Catholic and Protestants) but “is never used by the Orthodox Church. One of the major reasons the Orthodox Church does not accept the authority of the Apostles’ Creed is that it does not have the approval of a major ecumenical council.” (The Apostles' Creed and the Orthodox Church)


All that to say, I believe the Apostles’ Creed is an accurate and succinct presentation of The Faith handed down by the Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ.



Tuesday: St Patrick’s Confession of Faith
Wednesday: Apostles’ Creed and the earlier Rule of Faith
Monday: The Nicene Creed

Monday, March 9, 2020

The Rule of Faith - Origen

This is the third installment in my series on Apostolic Tradition. The first was Apostolic Tradition, "the belief that the Apostles wrote some things down and delivered other things orally. The Bible would be the written down things, the inspired, authoritative Word of God. Apostolic Tradition would be the orally handed down things." The second was The Rule of Faith from Irenaeus's writings, "Simply stated: They handed down The Faith."

Today I want to offer what Origen said about this Apostolic Tradition.

Origen of Alexandria, also known as Origen Adamantius, was an early Christian scholar and theologian (185-254). This is what he said about Apostolic Tradition in the Preface of his book, De Principiis (On The First Principles) [It was originally written in Greek and titled περι αρχων (peri archon).] I have slightly edited this for length, with bold sections added for emphasis.

"1. All who believe and are assured that grace and truth were obtained through Jesus Christ, and who know Christ to be the truth, agreeably to His own declaration, I am the truth, derive the knowledge which incites men to a good and happy life from no other source than from the very words and teaching of Christ. And by the words of Christ we do not mean those only which He spoke when He became man and tabernacled in the flesh; for before that time, Christ, the Word of God, was in Moses and the prophets. For without the Word of God, how could they have been able to prophesy of Christ? Moreover, after His ascension into heaven He spoke in His apostles…

2. Since many, however, of those who profess to believe in Christ differ from each other, not only in small and trifling matters, but also on subjects of the highest importance, as, e.g., regarding God, or the Lord Jesus Christ, or the Holy Spirit; and not only regarding these, but also regarding others which are created existences, viz., the powers and the holy virtues; it seems on that account necessary first of all to fix a definite limit and to lay down an unmistakable rule regarding each one of these, and then to pass to the investigation of other points. …so, seeing there are many who think they hold the opinions of Christ, and yet some of these think differently from their predecessors, yet as the teaching of the Church, transmitted in orderly succession from the apostles, and remaining in the Churches to the present day, is still preserved, that alone is to be accepted as truth which differs in no respect from ecclesiastical and apostolical tradition.

3. Now it ought to be known that the holy apostles, in preaching the faith of Christ, delivered themselves with the utmost clearness on certain points which they believed to be necessary to every one…

4. The particular points clearly delivered in the teaching of the apostles are as follow:—

First, That there is one God, who created and arranged all things, and who, when nothing existed, called all things into being— God from the first creation and foundation of the world— the God of all just men, of Adam, Abel, Seth, Enos, Enoch, Noe, Sere, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, the twelve patriarchs, Moses, and the prophets; and that this God in the last days, as He had announced beforehand by His prophets, sent our Lord Jesus Christ to call in the first place Israel to Himself, and in the second place the Gentiles, after the unfaithfulness of the people of Israel. This just and good God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Himself gave the law and the prophets, and the Gospels, being also the God of the apostles and of the Old and New Testaments.

Secondly, That Jesus Christ Himself, who came (into the world), was born of the Father before all creatures; that, after He had been the servant of the Father in the creation of all things— For by Him were all things made — He in the last times, divesting Himself (of His glory), became a man, and was incarnate although God, and while made a man remained the God which He was; that He assumed a body like to our own, differing in this respect only, that it was born of a virgin and of the Holy Spirit: that this Jesus Christ was truly born, and did truly suffer, and did not endure this death common (to man) in appearance only, but did truly die; that He did truly rise from the dead; and that after His resurrection He conversed with His disciples, and was taken up (into heaven).

Then, Thirdly, the apostles related that the Holy Spirit was associated in honour and dignity with the Father and the Son… And that this Spirit inspired each one of the saints, whether prophets or apostles; and that there was not one Spirit in the men of the old dispensation, and another in those who were inspired at the advent of Christ, is most clearly taught throughout the Churches.

5. After these points, also, the apostolic teaching is that the soul, having a substance and life of its own, shall, after its departure from the world, be rewarded according to its deserts, being destined to obtain either an inheritance of eternal life and blessedness, if its actions shall have procured this for it, or to be delivered up to eternal fire and punishments, if the guilt of its crimes shall have brought it down to this: and also, that there is to be a time of resurrection from the dead, when this body, which now is sown in corruption, shall rise in incorruption, and that which is sown in dishonour will rise in glory. This also is clearly defined in the teaching of the Church, that every rational soul is possessed of free-will and volition; that it has a struggle to maintain with the devil and his angels, and opposing influences….

6. Regarding the devil and his angels, and the opposing influences, the teaching of the Church has laid down that these beings exist indeed...

7. This also is a part of the Church's teaching, that the world was made and took its beginning at a certain time, and is to be destroyed on account of its wickedness.

8. Then, finally, that the Scriptures were written by the Spirit of God, and have a meaning, not such only as is apparent at first sight, but also another, which escapes the notice of most. For those (words) which are written are the forms of certain mysteries, and the images of divine things. Respecting which there is one opinion throughout the whole Church, that the whole law is indeed spiritual; but that the spiritual meaning which the law conveys is not known to all, but to those only on whom the grace of the Holy Spirit is bestowed in the word of wisdom and knowledge.

10. This also is a part of the teaching of the Church, that there are certain angels of God, and certain good influences, which are His servants in accomplishing the salvation of men."


Origen clearly sets forth and maintains that the Apostles wrote some things, the Scriptures, and that they also handed down some things, The Faith. This that they handed down is Apostolic Tradition. This is the Rule of Faith What is the role of this Rule of Faith handed down by the Apostles? "that alone is to be accepted as truth which differs in no respect from ecclesiastical and apostolical tradition."


Next Monday: The Apostles Creed

Thursday, March 5, 2020

The three greatest events in the history of the world Part 2

A couple of years ago when our Life Group was going through 1 John, I shared with them the three greatest events in the history of the world. I even added a future fourth event, because it is related to the first three. I got to thinking about them recently and wanted to share them again, this time in more detail. This is Part 2.

In Part 1 I offered the first two greatest events in the history of the world: the Creation of the world and the Incarnation of the Son of God. Today, the third greatest event:

3. Resurrection of Jesus from the dead

We have seen that God created the world ex nihilo, out of nothing; then He formed man from the dust of the ground and woman from the rib of the man. Man was created for fellowship with God but fell into sin and corruption and death; and to rescue His creation from sin and corruption God promised a Savior. This Savior is His own Son, who himself created the world and man in his image. In fulfillment of the promise, the Son of God was incarnate, made flesh, being conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary; he became man that he might give himself as a sacrifice for the undone race. He was crucified, died, and was buried, but on the third day he rose again from the dead! This is clearly one of the greatest events in the history of the world!!

Every Gospel tells us of the ministry of Jesus, ending with his crucifixion and resurrection. Here is the account of the resurrection in the Gospel According to Luke. I’ve highlighted the significant parts:

Luke 24
1 Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.  
2 And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.  
3 And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus.  
4 And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments:  
5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead?  
6 He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee, 

After this Peter runs to the tomb and finds it empty (11-12).
Jesus appears to two men walking to Emmaus who tell him the women found not his body (13-35).
Jesus appears to all the disciples (38-49)

37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit
38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? 
39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.  
40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?  
42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.  
43 And he took it, and did eat before them.  

Luke could not be clearer or more emphatic: Jesus was raised from the dead. His body. His flesh. Jesus was made flesh (incarnation), suffered and died on the cross, was buried, and this body was raised again. He doesn’t merely live on in our memory, or as a spirit, NO! he was raised from the dead! As Jesus himself said, I am the one who lives, and was dead, and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen.

Ignatius (AD 35-108), a disciple of the Apostle John, bishop of Antioch, and martyr said, “He suffered truly, even as also He truly raised up Himself. For I know that after His resurrection also He was still possessed of flesh, and I believe that He is so now.”

I’m seeing a pattern here. At Creation, man was formed of the dust of the ground; woman was formed from one of his ribs; the essential nature of man is body and soul. At the Incarnation, the Son of God was made flesh. At the Resurrection, the very body of Jesus was raised up!


Why do I not list the cross as one of the three greatest events in the history of the world? It was indeed a great event; one that secures our salvation and restoration to God, and demonstrated God’s great love for us, but in a sense it is a dependent event. What? Yes. The Incarnation gives the cross value – it was the Son of God who was crucified. The Resurrection gives it power – he died to free us from sin and death; the resurrection demonstrates he won!

"At the cross Jesus cried, It is finished! Through the resurrection the Father cried, Amen!” ~ Terry Virgo


As I said at the beginning, there is a fourth event, a future event, that will change the world

4. Second Coming of Jesus

Acts 1:9-11
  9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.  
10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;  
11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

This same Jesus. He was made flesh, suffered and died in the flesh, rose in the flesh, and is coming again in the flesh.

His first coming was humble and lowly, his second coming will be with power and glory. He will appear in the sky and every eye will see him as he descends to the earth; his feet will touch the Mount of Olives; the dead will be raised; there will be the judgment; he will establish his kingdom on the earth; there will be a new heaven and a new earth. “Oh what a day that will be, when my Jesus I shall see!”

And speaking of the resurrection of the dead, he will raise our bodies from the grave. The pattern will come full circle: made flesh at the beginning, the Word made flesh, his flesh raised from the dead, our flesh raised from the dead. As I wrote last year, redemption is physical!

And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.


Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

The three greatest events in the history of the world

A couple of years ago, when our Life Group was going through 1 John, I shared with them the three greatest events in the history of the world. I even added a future fourth event, because it is related to the first three. I got to thinking about them recently and wanted to share them again, this time in more detail. This is Part 1.

1. Creatio ex nihilo

Naturally, the creation of the world itself would be first on the list! In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Creatio ex nihilo is Latin for creation from nothing, which means God created the world, not from pre-existing material, but from nothing. There was nothing. He spoke. And there was something.

Hebrews 11:3 the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. 

It is really amazing to read through Genesis 1 and see the pattern: And God said…and it was so. There was nothing. He spoke. And there was something. Oh the power! Oh the wisdom! Oh the glory that belongs to the Creator!

Furthermore He created all things by His Son:

Colossians 1:12-17 For by him [the Son] were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. 

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power:
for thou hast created all things,
and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

Then we have the crowning point of creation:

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Genesis 2:7; 21-22 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

Man was not spoken into existence, but was formed of the dust of the ground; and the woman was made from one of Adam’s ribs. See how this unites us to the earth and to one another!

Genesis 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.

What a beginning! What a wonderful world He handed to Adam and Eve! But they sinned, and when they sinned there was a drastic change. What was very good was now corrupted and subject to death. Therefore God promised a Savior, a Deliverer, who would redeem and restore mankind and creation to Himself. The rest of the Old Testament is the story of God preparing the way and setting the stage for the Redeemer to come.

Which brings us to the second greatest event in the history of the world

2. Incarnatione De Verbi Dei

Athanasius (296-373), a bishop and theologian, wrote a great little book, De Incarnatione De Verbi Dei.* Latin makes it sound impressive, doesn’t it? Well, it is! In English the title is, The Incarnation of the Word of God.

The Word of God is the Son of God. This is the Redeemer promised throughout the Old Testament! The Incarnation was when the Son of God was made flesh. He was made man that he might redeem us from sin and death. This indeed was a momentous event in the history of the world!

John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us

How did this happen?

Luke 1:26-35 And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary.
And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. And when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be. And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

What are we talking about here? The Son of God, the Creator of all things visible and invisible, was made flesh. He became a man. He was really hungry and tired, He really bled when pierced with a spear and nailed to the cross, he really died and was buried.

As Athanasius explained it in his book:

“But He comes in condescension to show loving-kindness upon us, and to visit us. And seeing the race of rational creatures in the way to perish, and death reigning over them by corruption; seeing, once more, the unseemliness of what had come to pass: that the things whereof He Himself was Artificer were passing away: seeing, further, the exceeding wickedness of men, and how little by little they had increased it to an intolerable pitch against themselves: and seeing, lastly, how all men were under penalty of death: He took pity on our race, and had mercy on our infirmity, and condescended to our corruption, and, unable to bear that death should have the mastery — lest the creature should perish, and His Father's handiwork in men be spent for nought — He takes unto Himself a body, and that of no different sort from ours. He takes a body of our kind, and not merely so, but from a spotless and stainless virgin, knowing not a man, a body clean and in very truth pure from intercourse of men. For being Himself mighty, and Artificer of everything, He prepares the body in the Virgin as a temple unto Himself, and makes it His very own as an instrument, in it manifested, and in it dwelling. And thus taking from our bodies one of like nature, because all were under penalty of the corruption of death He gave it over to death in the stead of all, and offered it to the Father.”

Amen! The Incarnation leads to the cross. The work of salvation begins with the Incarnation, with the Word being made flesh. The Son of God became a man that he might restore us to God through his death on the cross.

The greatest event in the history of the world since creation!


* Athansaius originally wrote this book in Greek and in Greek the title is,
Λογος Περι Της Ενανθρωπησεως Του Λογου Και Της Δια Σωματος Προς Ημας Επιφανεις Αυτου
I don’t know why that never caught on! My rough translation into English would be, A Word Concerning The Word Becoming Man And His Manifestation To Us Through His Body. I like this much better!


Tomorrow: The Three Greatest Events In The History Of The World Part 2

Monday, March 2, 2020

The Rule of Faith

Last week I wrote on Apostolic Tradition, you can read it here. I concluded with three related questions, So what is this Apostolic Tradition? What is it that the Apostles handed down orally? What was it they deposited in the Church?

Simply stated: They handed down The Faith. The early Church called it The Rule of Faith. The word rule (Latin regula, Gr. kanon) means a standard by which something can be tested, and the Rule of Faith (Latin: regula fidei) serves as the norm or measure of the faith, the authority or standard for the faith. What early believers called the Rule of Faith was later called the Creed.

Irenaeus (AD 130-202)+ explains the role of Apostolic Tradition and the Rule of Faith for the early church:

Demonstration of Apostolic Preaching
“3. Now, that we may not suffer ought of this kind [heresy], we must needs hold the rule of the faith without deviation, and do the commandments ...  Now this doing is produced by faith … And faith is produced by the truth ; for faith rests on things that truly are … Now faith occasions this for us; even as the Elders, the disciples of the Apostles, have handed down to us.”

The rest of this excellent book is devoted to expounding the faith that has been handed down from the Apostles. I highly recommend it.

Against Heresies Book I
Chapter 10
1. The Church, though dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: [She believes] in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His [future] manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father to gather all things in one, and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Saviour, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess to Him, and that He should execute just judgment towards all; that He may send spiritual wickednesses, and the angels who transgressed and became apostates, together with the ungodly, and unrighteous, and wicked, and profane among men, into everlasting fire; but may, in the exercise of His grace, confer immortality on the righteous, and holy, and those who have kept His commandments, and have persevered in His love, some from the beginning [of their Christian course], and others from [the date of] their repentance, and may surround them with everlasting glory.

2. As I have already observed, the Church, having received this preaching and this faith, although scattered throughout the whole world, yet, as if occupying but one house, carefully preserves it. She also believes these points [of doctrine] just as if she had but one soul, and one and the same heart, and she proclaims them, and teaches them, and hands them down, with perfect harmony, as if she possessed only one mouth. For, although the languages of the world are dissimilar, yet the import of the tradition is one and the same. For the Churches which have been planted in Germany do not believe or hand down anything different, nor do those in Spain, nor those in Gaul, nor those in the East, nor those in Egypt, nor those in Libya, nor those which have been established in the central regions of the world. But as the sun, that creature of God, is one and the same throughout the whole world, so also the preaching of the truth shines everywhere, and enlightens all men that are willing to come to a knowledge of the truth. Nor will any one of the rulers in the Churches, however highly gifted he may be in point of eloquence, teach doctrines different from these (for no one is greater than the Master); nor, on the other hand, will he who is deficient in power of expression inflict injury on the tradition. For the faith being ever one and the same, neither does one who is able at great length to discourse regarding it, make any addition to it, nor does one, who can say but little diminish it.

Against Heresies Book III
Chapter 1
1. We have learned from none others the plan of our salvation, than from those through whom the Gospel has come down to us, which they did at one time proclaim in public, and, at a later period, by the will of God, handed down to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith.

Chapter 2
2. But, again, when we refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, [and] which is preserved by means of the succession of presbyters in the Churches, they object to tradition…

Chapter 4
1. Since therefore we have such proofs, it is not necessary to seek the truth among others which it is easy to obtain from the Church; since the apostles, like a rich man [depositing his money] in a bank, lodged in her hands most copiously all things pertaining to the truth: so that every man, whosoever will, can draw from her the water of life. For she is the entrance to life; all others are thieves and robbers. On this account are we bound to avoid them, but to make choice of the thing pertaining to the Church with the utmost diligence, and to lay hold of the tradition of the truth. For how stands the case? Suppose there arise a dispute relative to some important question among us, should we not have recourse to the most ancient Churches with which the apostles held constant intercourse, and learn from them what is certain and clear in regard to the present question? For how should it be if the apostles themselves had not left us writings? Would it not be necessary, [in that case,] to follow the course of the tradition which they handed down to those to whom they did commit the Churches?

2. To which course many nations of those barbarians who believe in Christ do assent, having salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit, without paper or ink, and, carefully preserving the ancient tradition, believing in one God, the Creator of heaven and earth, and all things therein, by means of Christ Jesus, the Son of God; who, because of His surpassing love towards His creation, condescended to be born of the virgin, He Himself uniting man through Himself to God, and having suffered under Pontius Pilate, and rising again, and having been received up in splendour, shall come in glory, the Saviour of those who are saved, and the Judge of those who are judged, and sending into eternal fire those who transform the truth, and despise His Father and His advent. Those who, in the absence of written documents, have believed this faith, are barbarians, so far as regards our language; but as regards doctrine, manner, and tenor of life, they are, because of faith, very wise indeed; and they do please God, ordering their conversation in all righteousness, chastity, and wisdom.


Irenaeus is very clear: “the apostles, like a rich man [depositing his money] in a bank, lodged in her hands most copiously all things pertaining to the truth.” They gave the Church their writings, the Scriptures, but they also handed down The Faith, what they called in Irenaeus’ day, The Rule of Faith. This is the Apostolic Tradition. This is what the Apostles handed down orally. This is very important. Later I plan to explain the relationship of the Rule of Faith to the Scriptures and to statements of faith today.

Next Monday: Origen


+ Irenaeus was the bishop of Lugdunum (now Lyon in the south of France). He had seen and heard the preaching of Polycarp, who was a disciple of the Apostle John. His best-known work is Against Heresies, or On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis (Ancient Greek : Ἔλεγχος καὶ ἀνατροπὴ τῆς ψευδωνύμου γνώσεως), sometimes referred to by its Latin title Adversus Haereses. It was written in AD 180.